Always more through critical

 Rather than through provision to play a role in real life. Critical theory of truth is to apply the actual event, therefore, not only in theory, heavier closer to the actual truth, and through application of often repeated, will make people more accustomed to these truths. Therefore, we think that in addition to determine what point of view with established theory, it also must determine what point of view with a critical.

critical theory of historical events we have described with a simple distinction between historical events. Accounts of historical events is just a simple list of facts, at best describe some of the most direct causal relationship.

critical discourse of historical events, there are three different intellectual activity.

first research the history of suspicious facts. This is a purely historical research, with the theory is two different things. The second reason

inferred from the results. This is a critique of pure. Such research is indispensable to the theory, because in theory, the experience needed to identify, confirm, or even just to speak for themselves, can only be resolved in this way.

The third is the use of means testing. This is true both praised the accused have criticized. Here, the theory is used to study the history, or more is used to draw lessons from history.

purely historical study in the latter two critical activities, the most important thing is to explore the root causes, that is, no doubt has to find out the truth so far, but not as common as halfway,UGG bailey button, which is unable to meet certain kinds of conclusions or assumptions made at random.

results inferred from the reasons, often had a difficult external difficulties to overcome, that is, did not understand the real reason. This difficulty in war than in any other activities in real life are more common. In war, truth is rarely able to fully understand the event, as motivation for action, even more so, because these motivations are parties, or intentionally concealed, or because of very short and casual, so no record in history. Therefore, critical study of historical research with the most must be the same, but even so, sometimes the results are often the same reasons, or do not coincide, that is, the result can not be seen as a natural product of known causes. Here is bound to produce disconnection, that is, some historical events we can learn from it. Theory that can be required is to explore the phenomenon that there is this disconnect where to stop, not down inference. If the mistake has been sufficient to show the results of known causes, so much attention, it was the worst. Critical Studies in addition to the above

external difficulties, there is a great inherent difficulties, it is rarely the result of war in the event generated by a single cause, but co-produced by a number of reasons, and only a just and serious retrospective case series of causes is not enough, more importantly, must also figure out the role of each cause. Thus, we must further explore the nature of reasons, so the critical field of study to enter the purely theoretical.

a critical study, that is, on the means test, you must understand the parties to use what means will produce results, these results are consistent with the parties intentions. To know what means will produce the results, we must explore the means of nature, which has entered the realm of theory.

we have said, is extremely important in the critical search for truth, no doubt about things and can not make conclusions as to argument can not allow others to freely be convinced, others can be free to make claims against it. In this way, it will argue, may not draw any conclusions and, therefore, do not get any lessons.

we have said, both for reasons of, or on the means test, will enter the realm of theory, that is, to enter the field of general truth (this truth is not only derived from the current situation.) If there is a useful theory, it can examine the theory when things have been identified as the basis, do not go back. But when there are no such theoretical truth, the study had to back in the end. If you frequently, then the writers will be troublesome, there are many things to do, but to every question on the ease of the almost impossible. The results, for the limited scope of their investigation, will have to satisfy a claim in the casual, although I do not think these ideas are free to give, but in others it seems are still free to give, because itself is not very clear and has not been confirmed. Therefore, useful theory is an important basis for criticism. If you do not with reasonable critical theory, people generally can not be learned, that is, can not be convincing and the barge did not fall.

But if that theory be able to have each included an abstract truth, critical task is simply to see whether the specific circumstances of the corresponding law, that is an illusion. If the provisions of the critique must not infringe the sacred theory, it would be ridiculous nerdy practice. Create a theoretical analysis of the kind of spirit that should guide the critical activities, and that such a critical spirit, and often enters the realm of theory, issues of particular importance for further instructions. Conversely, if the only mechanical copying of the critical theory, it can not achieve the critical goal. Theory of all the positive conclusion drawn from all the principles, rules and methods to become more rigid provisions, the more the lack of universality, the more there is no absolute truth and nature. These things could have been for human application, as to whether the application should always be determined by the judge. In the critique, not in theory, these conclusions should be regarded as the measure of all rules and standards, can only be as the parties did, as judging basis. Battle formation in the cavalry in the total configuration of different line infantry, but should be configured in the infantry behind, this is a tactical requirements, but contrary to this provision are to blame any configuration is stupid. In the critique, you should investigate the reason for this rule violation, found not justified only when it can refer to theoretical requirements.

another example, multiple attack have been identified in theory will reduce the possibility of victory, however, take any attack on multiple occasions, the failure of the fighting just does not further understanding of the actual situation is that the failure is caused by multiple attacks results, or offensive to win multiple occasions, to turn that theory provides is not correct, these two views as unreasonable. Critical analysis of both the spirit of the time are not allowed. In short, the theory through analysis of a conclusion that the main basis of criticism, in theory, have been provided, do not have to re-determine the critical time. So in theory, provide for, is to criticize something when ready for use.

critical task is to investigate what the reasons for the results produced, is to explore whether the means used to adapt the same purpose, because the same results when the purpose is very direct when the same means, the task easy to accomplish.

surprise if an army was, and therefore can not play an orderly and reasonable force, then the surprise effect is nothing to doubt. If the theory have been identified, were surrounded in the Battle of attack to get a larger victory, but winning sure is small, the question is whether the commander of this method is mainly used for a larger victory. If so, then the selection of means to correct. If you use this method is to obtain more certain victory, if not from specific conditions, but as common as attacks based solely on the general nature surrounded by this means, it would be a mistake means of nature, and therefore make mistakes.

here, criticism of the causes and means of inspection is not difficult, as long as the direct result of the limited investigation and purposes, things are not always easy. If people put aside the overall contact with the only things directly related to the study, then of course free to do so. But, like other activities in the world, as in the overall composition of all war with each other, so each one of the reasons, even if the reasons are very small, the result will be an impact on the outcome of the entire operation, so the final result will be changing, albeit small. Similarly, the means of each is bound to affect the ultimate goal.

Therefore, as long as there are visits to understand the value of a phenomenon, can continue to study the causes of the results, the same people not only to test methods under the direct purpose, but also can achieve a higher purpose for this purpose as means to be tested, so dependent on each other to discuss a series, has been without doubt the necessity of destination, without further examination to date. In many cases, particularly important in relation to the decisive measures, to the ultimate goal should always be investigated. That led directly to make peace aim. Obviously, back up in this process, each to a new stage,UGGs, people in determining when there is a new foothold. Therefore, the same means, may be appropriate from a low starting point of view, but from a higher starting point of view had to be abandoned.

study in a critical military operations, often because of some of the phenomena with the purpose of testing means in accordance with, because only through research on the causes, to find something worthy of a test object.

this from the bottom and back from the top down will encounter great difficulties, because the event because the farther away, the dominant forces and circumstances the more reason why people leave the events of the farther taking into account the other reasons people need more, and also to identify those reasons may have little impact on events. If the reason for the failure to find a battle, then of course, also failed to find the cause of the Battle of the outcome of the war, but this is only part of the reason, because, under different circumstances, there are more or less the result of other reasons also affect the final outcome of the war.

Similarly, with the footing improved testing methods will increase the time complexity, because the higher purpose for the use of means to achieve this purpose the more. War, all troops are pursuing the ultimate goal, therefore, to this end everything done or might do to be examined.

this way,bailey UGG boots, sometimes we must expand the scope of the study, in this case, it is very easy to confuse and trouble, because those who do not actually occur, but is likely to occur, and thus can not be it also had to make a lot of study assumptions.

Napoleon in March 1797 when the Italian Army,UGG boots, led by the Grand Duke Carl Thalia attack Manto Heights, Napoleon intended for the hope in the Grand Duke Carl reinforcements from the Rhine area not open to before the force battle. If only from the direct current point of view, it means that choice is correct, and the results proved this point. At that time, the strength of the Grand Duke Carl weak, only a river in the Thalia Manto try to resist, when you see the enemy forces are too strong and resolute action when to withdraw from the battlefield and give Nori Yamaguchi Shi Alps. Napoleon's victory can be achieved by the fortunate to what end? Can always enter the heart of the Austrian Empire, support Morrow and Austria led the two Rhine Army attack homes, and thus get close contact. Napoleon is one such consideration, and from this perspective is correct. But if from a higher standpoint, that is, the Governor from the French government (can and should be seen six weeks after the war situation to begin the Rhine) a critical point, then Napoleon crossed the Alps into the Nori facilities must be regarded as too adventure. Because if the Austrians transferred by reinforcements from the Rhine area too E Make the form a powerful reserve facilities, the Grand Duke Carl can be used to attack the Italian Army, so that may be wiped out not only the Italian Army, and the failure of the overall situation will be encountered . After Napoleon to Villach to see this point, so very happy to sign the Armistice Agreement Leoben.

However, if you criticize from a higher standpoint, and that the Austrians in Vienna between the army and the Grand Duke Karl was no reserve, so you can see Vienna, but because of the Italian Army was advancing threats.

assumes no capital of Austria, Napoleon's army that cover the same time know that the Grand Duke Carl E Make facilities are still too has the decisive advantage, then rapidly advancing Austrian heart is not no purpose. The value of this action is determined to keep the Austrians in Vienna on the degree of attention. Because, if attached great importance to keep the Austrians in Vienna, Napoleon made peace treaty that would rather accept the conditions, then the threat to Vienna can be seen as the ultimate goal. If Napoleon was aware of this from a point under the then critique can stop here. If you have any questions on this point, then to continue to be critical from a higher standpoint, and further asked: If people give up Vienna, Austria, to its vast hinterland to back, then the situation going to do? It is clear, if not the first Analysis Rhine events that may occur between both armies, it is impossible to answer this question. Accounted for in the French army forces a decisive advantage (of eighty thousand thirteen thousand people) case, the victory without much problem. But raises the question of the French government would like to take this victory the Governor and to what purpose? Is to exploit a victory which swept the Austrian Empire, the power to wipe out or weigh it, or just want to occupy large tracts of land, Austria, as a conclusion of peace capital? To find this out In both cases the result may have before you can conclude that the French government may choose which of the Governor one. The results show that the assumption, in order to completely defeat Austria, France troops also too small to do so will inevitably lead to fundamental changes in the situation, or even just want to keep the Austrian occupation and large tracts of land, but also make the French in the strategic situation facing the shortage of troops , then the result is bound to affect people of their status on the evaluation of the Italian Army, and placed small hope. Napoleon undoubtedly alone and helpless but knowing that the Grand Duke Karl signed  peace sake. In addition to the loss of some of the Austrian peace treaty even in the most successful war situation is also difficult to recover after the outside, no longer have to make greater sacrifices. However, if the French did not consider the following two questions, then even this benefit can not expect much  signed a peace can not be put into signing the peace treaty as a bold purpose; the first question is, how the valuation of Austrian these two results? Although in both cases, the Austrians have the final victory possible, but in both cases, that is the case in the continuation of the war, would have to make sacrifices, and sign a peace treaty to avoid the harsh conditions of those less sacrifice, whether in this case that are worthy of this sacrifice, the second question is whether the Government of Austria will use its advantages to the end victory ever considered what the other party may end if not for a moment lost the courage to defeat .